Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-07-2006, 02:42 PM   #1
noosacuda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
noosacuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
Default shaker hole

Hi all,
Can any one tell me if the hole for a Shaker is off-set to the right to allow for engine torque,or not? thanks

noosacuda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2006, 04:14 PM   #2
fat289
fat289
 
fat289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wagga NSW
Posts: 671
Default

to put it simply
no
__________________
I'm just having a great Falcon time , thanks for asking dumba$$

XRGT
XP ute 351w Toploader
99 Springer softail
XW Fairmont 302w / c4 col shift 58,000 miles
fat289 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2006, 04:39 PM   #3
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

Noosacuda: Only Chrysler liked offsetting engines (V8 K-frame), inclining engines (slant6) etc, etc. Probably the shaker hoods on 440RB/426Hemi cars are offset to allow for engine torque that only Mopar V8s can produce? :
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-07-2006, 05:59 PM   #4
noosacuda
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
noosacuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 604
Default

Thanks.I just didn't want the shaker to hit the sides because of motor moving. (mmmm....426!)
I knew of a 440 6 pak,4 speed in a VC wagon,the torque did wonderful things to the floor,A and B pillars!
noosacuda is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL