Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-03-2013, 07:57 PM   #1
davistev
Regular Member
 
davistev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Adelaide and Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 166
Unhappy Defected for no Mud Flaps

Yesterday my young son was defected (minor - only needs to show up at station with repair done) because his old car did not have mud flaps on the rear. This was in Adelaide, South Australia. I thought this was a joke but sure enough, Regency Park Inspection center requires mud flaps.

Then I noticed that many newer cars do not come with mud flaps - what gives? Indeed, my 2012 Maxima does not have mud flaps - does this mean I was sold a vehicle that is not roadworthy under SA law?

Sure enough, all of SA Police Commodores have mud flaps installed on them.

I am confused, the law seems pretty clear about mud flaps in SA, but many new dealerships sell mud flaps as an option. Can they do this? Or is there something that says that modern plastic rear ends are technically one big mud flap!

Confused in the land of the crows!

__________________
Just Learning about Cars! Own a 1990 Fairmont and a 1991 Ford Corsair
davistev is offline  
Old 16-03-2013, 08:02 PM   #2
sbutler
335 kw of goodness
 
sbutler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: south of Newcastle
Posts: 6,242
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Mudflaps are an aftermarket item & dont come standard. I'd fight it..
__________________
CAUTION!
STILL Contain's opinion's & fact's that may offend !!!
:



2012 GTP 213 black what was I thinking? NOW FOR SALE>>
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11439680
sbutler is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 08:03 PM   #3
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Government cars have them for resale, less marks and scratches when they are sent off for auction.

There is no requirement for rear mudflaps, do we know everything? Is it a light commercial vehicle or light truck or 4wd - where the body sits higher off the ground which covers less tyre.
Brazen is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 08:07 PM   #4
MrEL
Sick Puppy
 
MrEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,963
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

The tyre has to be covered to a point no more then 300mm off the ground. Cars do this by their design.
Tray back utes , 4x4's etc dont so they need mud flaps.
Ive been done before for no mud flaps on my 4x4.
MrEL is offline  
3 users like this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 08:09 PM   #5
TheInterceptor
Cruising...
 
TheInterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

I was under the impression 4wd's had to have mudflaps, but passenger cars, id say nope given so many cars dont have it..
__________________
FBT '98
BA XT '04
F100 4x4 '82

Subaru Outback '02
TheInterceptor is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 08:09 PM   #6
davistev
Regular Member
 
davistev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Adelaide and Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 166
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrEL View Post
The tyre has to be covered to a point no more then 300mm off the ground. Cars do this by their design.
Tray back utes , 4x4's etc dont so they need mud flaps.
Ive been done before for no mud flaps on my 4x4.
Yeah, he was driving a tray top.
__________________
Just Learning about Cars! Own a 1990 Fairmont and a 1991 Ford Corsair
davistev is offline  
Old 16-03-2013, 08:12 PM   #7
Silver Ghia
Moderator
Donating Member3
 
Silver Ghia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,603
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: As Silver Ghia his contributions to the AU and BA technical areas have been of high quality and valuable to the member base. 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by davistev View Post
Yeah, he was driving a tray top.
Thats why then.
Silver Ghia is online now  
6 users like this post:
Old 16-03-2013, 08:45 PM   #8
kempy311
BEN
 
kempy311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,875
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by davistev View Post
Yeah, he was driving a tray top.
That would be your reason then a lot of stuff can flick up off the road with no mud flaps on a 4x4.
__________________
My Thread. The new whip: 2014 FGX XR8 Auto in victory gold. Mods : BMC air filter, 1500cc injectors, Walbro 485, 58mm kpm snout, kpm intercooler, 35% front and 20% rear tint, pedders supercar coilovers, whiteline sway bars, Phillips HIDs, lenso d1r wheels.
331rwkw.
12.7 sec stock as a rock with a passenger.
Now with 620rwhp ready to run the 10

built zf, built tailshaft, corn juice all to come.

The old rig: 2008 FG XR8 Auto in dash green with a tonne of mods to make 311rwkw.
kempy311 is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 07:14 AM   #9
staity
Regular Member
 
staity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bathurst
Posts: 186
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

ADR 15.2.4 Wheel guards may consist of either permanent body structure or part structure and other components, including mud flaps, provided the specified protection is retained during vehicle operation.

ADR 15.2.5 states that: Notwithstanding the requirements specified above (groups of axles) the wheel gaurd including a mud flap (if fitted) need not be less than 230mm from the ground for other than off- road vehicles, or 300mm in the case of vehicles designed for off- road operation.

ADR15.3.2 The wheels of a vehicle and the wheel of a side car must be fitted with wheel guards of width not less than the section width of the tyre. The wheel guards must be so designed as to protect other road users, as far as practicable, against thrown up stones,mud, ice snow and water and to reduce for those users the dangers due to contact with the moving wheels.



Stolen from another forum
__________________
2011 Nissan Pathfinder ST-L Black like my heart

2013 Ford Kuga Titanium Gunmetal Grey
staity is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 08:34 AM   #10
davistev
Regular Member
 
davistev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Adelaide and Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 166
Unhappy Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by staity View Post
ADR 15.2.5 states that: Notwithstanding the requirements specified above (groups of axles) the wheel gaurd including a mud flap (if fitted) need not be less than 230mm from the ground for other than off- road vehicles, or 300mm in the case of vehicles designed for off- road operation.
Stolen from another forum
In that case, my brand new Nissan Maxima straight from the dealer could be defected as the clearance on the rear wheel is 280mm - a mud flap is needed if the rear of the vehicle sits higher than 230mm

see http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2006L03056

It would seem that many new vehicles have failed to comply with this standard.
__________________
Just Learning about Cars! Own a 1990 Fairmont and a 1991 Ford Corsair

Last edited by davistev; 17-03-2013 at 08:48 AM.
davistev is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 08:50 AM   #11
H.G
Driver Returns On Foot
 
H.G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Rockhampton mostly
Posts: 797
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Best thing about no mudflaps on my 4x4.... No tail gaters!
H.G is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 10:56 AM   #12
svo supporter
Fixing Ford's **** ups
 
svo supporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,759
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by davistev View Post
In that case, my brand new Nissan Maxima straight from the dealer could be defected as the clearance on the rear wheel is 280mm - a mud flap is needed if the rear of the vehicle sits higher than 230mm

see http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2006L03056

It would seem that many new vehicles have failed to comply with this standard.
For your son to be defected for this, the copper must have had a bad day or your son had an attitude.

I'd be fitting some mudflaps, get the defect removed and move on....Don't even argue with the cop over it, otherwise they'll get nastier and try for other things...ie more defects
__________________
A wheel alignment fixes everything, when it comes to front end issues. This includes any little noises.



Please read the manual carefully, as the these manufacturers spent millions of dollars making sure it is perfect.....Now why are there so many problems with my car, when I follow the instructions to the letter?....Answer, majority rules round here


Lock me up and throw away the key because I'm a hoon....I got caught doing 59 in a 60 zone

Last edited by svo supporter; 17-03-2013 at 11:02 AM.
svo supporter is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 11:19 AM   #13
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,409
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by H.G View Post
Best thing about no mudflaps on my 4x4.... No tail gaters!
Be aware that you are liable for any damage you inflict on following vehicles, I had this happen to me.
jpd80 is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 11:27 AM   #14
irish2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by davistev View Post
In that case, my brand new Nissan Maxima straight from the dealer could be defected as the clearance on the rear wheel is 280mm - a mud flap is needed if the rear of the vehicle sits higher than 230mm

see http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2006L03056

It would seem that many new vehicles have failed to comply with this standard.
The measurement is to the bottom of the quarter panel behind the wheel. I am yet to see a maxima with 280mm of ground clearance to panels.
irish2 is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 11:29 AM   #15
irish2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by H.G View Post
Best thing about no mudflaps on my 4x4.... No tail gaters!
No regard for other road users is a major problem on the roads today.

Maybe you wouldn't have tailgaters if you drove at the speed limit and kept left when no overtaking. I don't get tailgated and I stick to these simple rules.
irish2 is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 11:29 AM   #16
ratter
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ratter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pit Lane
Posts: 11,867
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Shares his in-depth tuning knowledge with the forum, very helpful. Contributor: For members who make a contribution worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For his indepth tutorial on adding borders to photographs 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by svo supporter View Post
For your son to be defected for this, the copper must have had a bad day or your son had an attitude.

I'd be fitting some mudflaps, get the defect removed and move on....Don't even argue with the cop over it, otherwise they'll get nastier and try for other things...ie more defects

this x 2
__________________
Pit Lane Performance
20 Rosella St Frankston 03 9783 8122

Authorised Streetfighter, Pcmtec , SCT & HP Tuners Tuning Agent,
ratter is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 11:37 AM   #17
gtxb67
moderator ford coupe club
 
gtxb67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by svo supporter View Post
For your son to be defected for this, the copper must have had a bad day or your son had an attitude
i am not having a go at your post, but it is amazing how many victims talk about the copper having a bad day

if the victims didn't give attitude, then the coppers would probably be having a good day
gtxb67 is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 11:45 AM   #18
ratter
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ratter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pit Lane
Posts: 11,867
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Shares his in-depth tuning knowledge with the forum, very helpful. Contributor: For members who make a contribution worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For his indepth tutorial on adding borders to photographs 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Police are human and do show emotion, it is possible that he was having a bad day or just dealt with several rude people before hand, but many fail to realise that a good attitude can help with the Policemans final actions, a lot of people start with the negative attitude towards the police straight away.
__________________
Pit Lane Performance
20 Rosella St Frankston 03 9783 8122

Authorised Streetfighter, Pcmtec , SCT & HP Tuners Tuning Agent,
ratter is offline  
2 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 11:51 AM   #19
OffRoadFalcon
"Flooded it mate?"
 
OffRoadFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Busselton, Western Australia
Posts: 3,196
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish2 View Post
No regard for other road users is a major problem on the roads today.

Maybe you wouldn't have tailgaters if you drove at the speed limit and kept left when no overtaking. I don't get tailgated and I stick to these simple rules.
This method doesnt often work in country areas. I can be sitting at 110 on a one lane country road and have someone whose doing 120 on my tail (because they know theres rarely cameras or cops) and they cant go past because of corners etc.


Anyway, very interesting to learn about these mudflap rules, since I like them so much.
OffRoadFalcon is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 11:56 AM   #20
XB GS 351 Coupe
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mid North Coast
Posts: 6,443
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by davistev View Post
Yeah, he was driving a tray top.
That explains it. You need mud flaps.

Go fit some and get the defect cleared, no biggie.


Quote:
Originally Posted by H.G View Post
Best thing about no mudflaps on my 4x4.... No tail gaters!
Hopefully you get defected soon, as we don't need people inconsiderate to other road users on the road.
__________________
The Daily Driver : '98 EL Falcon, 5 Speed , 3.45 lsd

The Week End Bruiser : FPV BF GT 40th Anniversary, 6 Speed Manual, 6/4 Brembo and lots of Herrod goodies

Project 1 : '75 XB GS 351 Ute, Toploader, 9" with 3.5's

Project 2 : '74 XB GS Big Block Coupe, Toploader, 9" with 4.11's

In Storage : '74 XB GS 351 Fairmont Sedan



XB Falcon Owners Group



Mike's Man Cave


XB GS 351 Coupe is offline  
3 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 02:31 PM   #21
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish2 View Post
Maybe you wouldn't have tailgaters if you drove at the speed limit and kept left when no overtaking. I don't get tailgated and I stick to these simple rules.
Was that sarcasm?

Because I think most tailgaters do it just to get their jollies out of ****ing people off. And even if that isnt the case & they are tailgating for the reason you provide, how does that make them any better?

Im not defending the post youre quoting, because yes that is inconsiderate as well.
SSD-85 is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 02:38 PM   #22
Valid8
COOGES
 
Valid8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Berwick Vic
Posts: 1,207
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by staity View Post
ADR 15.2.4 Wheel guards may consist of either permanent body structure or part structure and other components, including mud flaps, provided the specified protection is retained during vehicle operation.

ADR 15.2.5 states that: Notwithstanding the requirements specified above (groups of axles) the wheel gaurd including a mud flap (if fitted) need not be less than 230mm from the ground for other than off- road vehicles, or 300mm in the case of vehicles designed for off- road operation.

ADR15.3.2 The wheels of a vehicle and the wheel of a side car must be fitted with wheel guards of width not less than the section width of the tyre. The wheel guards must be so designed as to protect other road users, as far as practicable, against thrown up stones,mud, ice snow and water and to reduce for those users the dangers due to contact with the moving wheels.



Stolen from another forum
I was curious so I measured the xr8. 230mm behind the wheel.
__________________
COOGES- FG 50th ANNIVERSARY XR6T MANUAL / 1965 BUICK RIVIERA
Valid8 is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 02:39 PM   #23
gtxb67
moderator ford coupe club
 
gtxb67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagleheart View Post
Im not defending the post youre quoting, because yes that is inconsiderate as well.
it is, but if some mongrel wasn't driving right beside someone in the fast lane, then the amount of tailgating would drop dramatically

it is all about consideration - i have held up some, like everyone would have, but i do make a huge effort to move over and let others passed
it isn't up to me to drive 3 abreast with others while stopping anyone else from getting passed - i try and let traffic flow, not bunch it up
gtxb67 is offline  
3 users like this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 02:53 PM   #24
davistev
Regular Member
 
davistev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Adelaide and Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 166
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valid8 View Post
I was curious so I measured the xr8. 230mm behind the wheel.
You all good. I wonder how many other passenger vehicles would not pass the 230mm rule.
__________________
Just Learning about Cars! Own a 1990 Fairmont and a 1991 Ford Corsair
davistev is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 03:15 PM   #25
XR6Uteman
Ute Star
 
XR6Uteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 56
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

And here is me thinking the salesman was full of it when I wanted to order XR-6 ute with no rear mud-spat, and he told me it wouldn't be road worthy.
XR6Uteman is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 07:24 PM   #26
svo supporter
Fixing Ford's **** ups
 
svo supporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,759
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtxb67 View Post
i am not having a go at your post, but it is amazing how many victims talk about the copper having a bad day

if the victims didn't give attitude, then the coppers would probably be having a good day
I generally find, getting out all smiles and cheer, the coppers tend to smile back, therefore starting them on the right foot to begin with.....

So yes, starting with a good attitude to begin with, generally helps the coppers get over any previous bad attitude drivers....and keep the good attitude up, whilse on the side of the road.....saves standing there for a long time...even for a licence, rego and breath check....
__________________
A wheel alignment fixes everything, when it comes to front end issues. This includes any little noises.



Please read the manual carefully, as the these manufacturers spent millions of dollars making sure it is perfect.....Now why are there so many problems with my car, when I follow the instructions to the letter?....Answer, majority rules round here


Lock me up and throw away the key because I'm a hoon....I got caught doing 59 in a 60 zone
svo supporter is offline  
This user likes this post:
Old 17-03-2013, 07:28 PM   #27
svo supporter
Fixing Ford's **** ups
 
svo supporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,759
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Not tailgating doesn't mean a rock won't get flicked up and take a windscreen out.....The mudflaps are designed to deflect the rocks downwards...It also reduces the chances of the rock being flung at any other traffic on the road.

So I can see the reasoning behind having them and why the coppers would defect for not having them...
__________________
A wheel alignment fixes everything, when it comes to front end issues. This includes any little noises.



Please read the manual carefully, as the these manufacturers spent millions of dollars making sure it is perfect.....Now why are there so many problems with my car, when I follow the instructions to the letter?....Answer, majority rules round here


Lock me up and throw away the key because I'm a hoon....I got caught doing 59 in a 60 zone
svo supporter is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 07:33 PM   #28
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish2 View Post
Maybe you wouldn't have tailgaters if you drove at the speed limit and kept left when no overtaking. I don't get tailgated and I stick to these simple rules.

Yes, because no one blatantly speeds and sits on your butt no matter how fast you go...
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 07:37 PM   #29
Dave R
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,940
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Valued contributor especially in the FG threads. Offers help and information to all. Posts are always in a positive manner. 
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

Grinzy must have joined the police force.
Dave R is offline  
Old 17-03-2013, 08:06 PM   #30
Mark^^
Two-Spirits
 
Mark^^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,214
Default Re: Defected for no Mud Flaps

I am buying a new 4x4 and not looing forward to buying mud spats, cost is $660 for the 4 of them.
Mark^^ is offline  
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL