|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-06-2009, 11:54 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
|
General Motors filed for bankruptcy protection Monday, culminating the collapse of the automaker that once symbolized American global industrial might.
The filing in the same New York court that approved a speedy restructuring for Chrysler aims to allow GM to re-emerge as a new, leaner company within 60 to 90 days. GM listed asset of 82.3 billion US dollars and debts of 172.8 billion in the case, assigned to Judge Robert Gerber, in one of the biggest bankruptcy cases in US history. The US industrial icon enters the process with billions in government financing and agreements already in place to cut labor costs, swap much of its debt for equity and reduce its liabilities by 50 percent. Senior US officials pledged to provide 30 billion US dollars to the "new GM" to emerge from the process, on top of nearly 20 billion US dollars already loaned to the ailing firm. The deal would give the US government a 60 percent stake in the auto giant, while the governments of Canada and Ontario, which have several GM factories, will provide an additional 9.5 billion US dollars in financing and receive a 12 percent stake. The European Opel and Vauxhall subsidiaries are leaving the GM empire under a rescue engineered this weekend in Germany with support from a Canadian company and a Russian bank. Officials said the process is expected to be similar to that of Chrysler, which is expected to emerge from bankruptcy protection this week after just over a month. However, the process will not be "as speedy as Chrysler because GM is a far larger, far more complicated global company," senior administration officials cautioned. President Barack Obama, who had given GM a deadline to come up with a viability plan, was to hold a press conference at 11:55 am (1555 GMT) Monday to discuss the state of the automotive industry. Newly appointed GM chief executive officer Fritz Henderson, who is expected to continue to steer the new company, will speak to the media shortly afterwards. The largest US automaker will close 11 plants and idle three others as it slashes its operating costs in order to lower its break-even point by 40 percent in terms of overall US industry sales. Officials cautioned that the Obama administration has no intention of nationalizing General Motors over the long term and will not be participating in its day-to-day operations. "The goal is to promote strong viable companies that can become profitable quickly and contribute to economic growth and jobs without government involvement," a senior US official said. Creditors holding about 54 percent of General's Motors bonds agreed to a plan that would swap 27.1 billion US dollars in debt for a 10 percent stake and warrants allowing them to buy an additional 15 percent stake, officials said. Bondholders who rejected the plan could still fight it in court, but the government maintains they could end up with little or nothing if they take that path. A retiree health care trust will receive a 17.5 percent stake in the new GM and 6.5 billion US dollars in preferred stock in exchange for forgiving much of a 20-billion-dollar obligation. Employees will continue to be paid and GM will immediately seek permission to continue to pay suppliers and honor customer warranties. GM will also offer about 40 percent of its dealers 18 months to wind down their operations and will immediately seek permission to honor incentives offered to its remaining dealers, under a plan to shrink the number of GM sales outlets. http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-n...0601-bt2v.html |
||
02-06-2009, 12:21 AM | #2 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 117
|
Not unexpected, but still an astonishing event.
I used to work at Holden and experienced some GM inefficiencies first hand. I used to work in the group that dealt with issues on the imported Opel products, Astra, Barina, Vectra. The arrangement was basically that our engineering hours would be billed back to Opel as kind of a remote engineering team working on behalf of the germans. The trouble is that since the cars weren't made here and all the suppliers were European, we didn't actually fix anything, at best we would report the problem to the Opel engineers. Occasionally we'd work on some Commodore stuff, but mostly we had bugger-all to do and nobody cared. The whole purpose of the exercise was to rip funds off Opel to boost holden's bottom line (Holden would of course re-bill at a rate for higher than our wages to give them a tidy margin). I can only imagine GM must be rife with such little scams - Another one, which sort of addresses the balance with Opel a bit, is the payment of royalties on the crappy swing-axle IRS as fitted to the commodore. Can you actually believe Holden paid money on every car for that? |
||
02-06-2009, 12:34 AM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
i imagine that sorta stuff goes on at many big companies, it will be interesting to see how the chips fall.
|
||
02-06-2009, 12:57 AM | #4 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Holden by all accounts has got it's house in order in recent years, but when I worked there there was an air of shonkiness about how things were done. Many of the processes such as engineering releasing were very poor and not very accountable either. Ford was certainly better in this respect - no question about it. |
|||
02-06-2009, 01:05 AM | #5 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 117
|
I'm still left wondering what GM are going to do to fix this. All I read is a lot of waffle about juggling bond ownerships. That ain't gonna fix anything without some product to sell. They don't seem to have any decent vehicles available to them - The Commodore/G8 is a good car by their standard but is not available in any significant volume, likewise the'll not have access to any Opel vehicles anymore which leaves stuff like the Cruze - are they pinning their hopes on that as a savoiur?
|
||
02-06-2009, 01:07 AM | #6 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
Quote:
Actually they have a 35% stake in Opel after the deal with Magna.
__________________
Daniel |
|||
02-06-2009, 01:08 AM | #7 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 117
|
Well that might help, but still - the Opel based cars are somewhat mediocre too.
|
||
02-06-2009, 01:11 AM | #8 | ||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
All the news leading up to the bankruptcy are found in this thread. For people who may not have read it. It'll give people an idea how things may pan out.
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11256013
__________________
Daniel |
||