Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-12-2011, 11:52 AM   #61
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveJH
Get used to them, they'll be a legal requirement here sooner or later. And all new European cars will have them as new models are introduced over there.
Most of Europe is a dark and dingy place, we have much higher levels of sunlight here so I think its irrelevant for Australia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles_wif_xf
Falc'man, the new rack is EPAS or just an improved version of the rack in the MkI's?
Its actually a backwards step, they removed the variable ratio Bishop rack and installed a cheaper fixed ratio rack instead. Cost cutting I reckon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Hi mate,
Not EPAS but from what I understood from Bossxr8 it's in preparation for EPAS in a year or two - the previous steering rack isn't compatible with EPAS.
I think its more cost cutting then preparation for EPAS, an electric rack will require the removal of the fixed ratio hydraulic setup anyway, they are 2 different parts. On an electric rack the electric motor is part of the steering rack. I'd assume they would use the same Territory/Mustang rack which would be a lot different anyway.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 11:57 AM   #62
Redrum
Force Fed Fords
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 5,556
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

LED driving lights took cheap, after market and tacky. The HSV's looked better without them.

On car reporting I notice Holden's good mate Paul GOVER in his comments Herald Sun Cars Guide today just had to make mention that Falcon sales are still going down. He never stops.
__________________
2021 Focus ST-3 Mountune Enhanced
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 12:11 PM   #63
Fev
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Fev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cattai, Sydney
Posts: 7,701
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

EVERYONEs sales are going down at the moment..
__________________
1992 EBII Fairmont Ghia 4.0l <---Click for the Gallery!
Insta@mooneye_ghia
White on bright red smoothies with thick whitewalls. Cruising around to some rockabilly
Fev is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 12:50 PM   #64
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Most of Europe is a dark and dingy place, we have much higher levels of sunlight here so I think its irrelevant for Australia.

Its actually a backwards step, they removed the variable ratio Bishop rack and installed a cheaper fixed ratio rack instead. Cost cutting I reckon.

I think its more cost cutting then preparation for EPAS, an electric rack will require the removal of the fixed ratio hydraulic setup anyway, they are 2 different parts. On an electric rack the electric motor is part of the steering rack. I'd assume they would use the same Territory/Mustang rack which would be a lot different anyway.
The tester noted it was the first FG that he had driven that didn't have the minor rack rattle (pulsing feedback). Mercedes Benz use(d) the same Bishop variable rack and they have had the same problem in similar rough / potholed conditions when driven hard.

I think it is an inherent issue with the design which is otherwise functionally
brilliant.

In a perfect world they would've transitioned straight over to the EPAS - collected the 3% fuel saving - as used in Territory and made the changes they needed to fit / work as intended. The Territory EPAS started from the Mustang base but got completely redesigned in the end and made much stiffer, lighter weight and better overall.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 02:26 PM   #65
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Here's hoping EPAS will be implemented in the next 12 months.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 02:46 PM   #66
Dr Smith
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melb.
Posts: 4,479
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum
LED driving lights took cheap, after market and tacky. The HSV's looked better without them.

On car reporting I notice Holden's good mate Paul GOVER in his comments Herald Sun Cars Guide today just had to make mention that Falcon sales are still going down. He never stops.
..and when did he change from editor to chief reporter or whatever title the story carried?
Dr Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 03:19 PM   #67
Falcman0o7
Banned
 
Falcman0o7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: launceston TAS
Posts: 1,847
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum
LED driving lights took cheap, after market and tacky. The HSV's looked better without them.

On car reporting I notice Holden's good mate Paul GOVER in his comments Herald Sun Cars Guide today just had to make mention that Falcon sales are still going down. He never stops.
He is a typical sheep.
Falcman0o7 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 03:37 PM   #68
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,765
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

What's a kidney worth??? That's what I'll sell to get one!!
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 04:50 PM   #69
Carby
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 179
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1TUFFUTE
wow i was looking at a mag today and they said HSV didnt want to give them a HSV black edition for their pcoty test they were doing.......whats wrong with all the gts all of a sudden.....

Not much I'd say - according to the Managing editor of Carsguide (todays edition) his best car for 2011:

"HSV GTS, a benchmark Aussie Muscle car delivering stunning performance at a real world price"


The GT could do with bigger tyres and adaptive suspension to go with it's great engine.
Carby is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 05:27 PM   #70
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carby
Not much I'd say - according to the Managing editor of Carsguide (todays edition) his best car for 2011:

"HSV GTS, a benchmark Aussie Muscle car delivering stunning performance at a real world price"


The GT could do with bigger tyres and adaptive suspension to go with it's great engine.

Benchmark?

In that the mark on the bench you stand on to get to the top shelf where the good stuff is kept?
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 06:51 PM   #71
drew`SEVNT5
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chapel St
Posts: 774
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum
LED driving lights took cheap, after market and tacky. The HSV's looked better without them.

On car reporting I notice Holden's good mate Paul GOVER in his comments Herald Sun Cars Guide today just had to make mention that Falcon sales are still going down. He never stops.

He isn't telling any lies....

Bad news won't go away if you just try to ignore it.
__________________
Current

-2011 Nissan 370z Coupe (6M)-
-2006 Husqvarna SMRR450-
drew`SEVNT5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-12-2011, 11:48 PM   #72
GazzF6
Perth WA
Donating Member1
 
GazzF6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 567
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auslandau
Because the GT can be compared to BM's, Merc's & Lexus and hold their heads up ....... why compare it to a HSV?
I like your thinking, just gold!
__________________
2008 FG F6 310 - Auto 384KW/850Nm(RW)
Monsta Torque WA : Prestige Exhaust : AutoFX Paint Protection : Gino's Panel & Paint : AC Automatics :

2016 Jaguar XE Black Pack R-Sport
GazzF6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2011, 05:08 AM   #73
Rodge
Banned
 
Rodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,801
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Benchmark?

In that the mark on the bench you stand on to get to the top shelf where the good stuff is kept?
That's Gold. HSV's are only the benchmark for sissy's who can't handle the FPV's performance.

Last edited by Rodge; 24-12-2011 at 05:18 AM.
Rodge is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2011, 08:26 AM   #74
b055m4n
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: wollongong
Posts: 227
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

led running lights give me a break....its a mans car not for metro's....but Ford just not doing it self any favours steering rack rattles.
b055m4n is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2011, 08:57 AM   #75
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,791
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auslandau
Because the GT can be compared to BM's, Merc's & Lexus and hold their heads up ....... why compare it to a HSV?
Probably because BMW, Merc and Lexus customers would look at the FPV/Ford badge and laugh while sipping on their latte. Its not the car, its the badge.

They should have daytime running lights, its a good safety feature, they're a hell of a lot brighter than having your parkers on when it comes to getting noticed. We just fitted Phillips ones to an ACT Ambulance we where building and they look good.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-12-2011, 09:43 AM   #76
GTpilot
FG GT 5.4 w/ additions!
 
GTpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sunny SE Melbourne
Posts: 2,105
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

This is a small article spawned from a greater 4 car comparo with the other 3 mentioned cars, soon to be published. Now consider Feann's comments on the GT were made whilst also in the company of, and driving the IS-F, M3, and C63.

Feann is a great journo, unbiased and a nice guy. You are all reading the DRL comments to seriously. The four car comparo will be an interesting read, and for the GT, it's great company to be with!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by prasac
googoo gaga whoops sorry i thought this was the let's be whiny babies thread
GTpilot is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 03:12 AM   #77
1TUFFUTE
Banned
 
1TUFFUTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTpilot
This is a small article spawned from a greater 4 car comparo with the other 3 mentioned cars, soon to be published. Now consider Feann's comments on the GT were made whilst also in the company of, and driving the IS-F, M3, and C63.

Feann is a great journo, unbiased and a nice guy. You are all reading the DRL comments to seriously. The four car comparo will be an interesting read, and for the GT, it's great company to be with!
yeah and yet still...a fat, plastic,,, ugly, slower,, old engind, boyracer teched and overpriced hsv still gets the nod for the best car this year. What a load of drivel.
Never mind the F6 which still is the best sports sedan in the world under 100k..and the awesomely aussie engineered mustang supercharged engined GT falcon which despite somes opinions still hands it to the hsv around nearly every strip and track weve seen them compared on. capability shouldnt be underestmated.

Last edited by 1TUFFUTE; 25-12-2011 at 03:14 AM. Reason: spelling again
1TUFFUTE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-12-2011, 10:09 PM   #78
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Its Carsguide, what do you expect. Everything with a Holden badge is the best car in the world bar none, thousands of dollars in a brown paper bag say so.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 08:57 AM   #79
Rodge
Banned
 
Rodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,801
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTpilot
This is a small article spawned from a greater 4 car comparo with the other 3 mentioned cars, soon to be published. Now consider Feann's comments on the GT were made whilst also in the company of, and driving the IS-F, M3, and C63.

Feann is a great journo, unbiased and a nice guy. You are all reading the DRL comments to seriously. The four car comparo will be an interesting read, and for the GT, it's great company to be with!
Looking forward to it also. He liked the ride-handling balance too, (notice all the naysayers bleating how they don't handle have gone strangly quiet on this thread). FPV's ride / handling is structured around local road conditions, unlike any of the other cars.

Real world rolling acceleration, (i.e. what really matters in real world driving), was also the best of the bunch and just look at the cars and the prices of them, he's comparing it too.
Rodge is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 03:48 PM   #80
Bent8
Long live the GT !
 
Bent8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 1,863
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopped
The C63 Merc is a dead set beast.

Nice review for the GT too.
Don't forget the C63 is over 100kg lighter than the GT...
__________________
2018 Ford Mustang GT - Oxford White | Auto | Herrod Tune | K&N Filter | StreetFighter Oil Separators | H&R Springs | Whiteline Vertical Links | Ceramic Protection | Tint

"Whatya think of me car, XR Falcon, 351 Blown Cleveland running Motec injection and runnin' on methanol... goes pretty hard too, got heaps of torque for chucking burnouts, IT'S UNREAL !!" - Poida
Bent8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 07:37 PM   #81
SS_01
Erebus Motorsport Fan
 
SS_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 624
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Nice review for the GT. About time, I haven't read a review like that on a FPV for a long time. I still wish that FPV would of added the fatter wheels to the back, and DRL's can look good if integrated correctly. The 8 inch screen does make the car feel more upmarket, but id still like to see further differentiation from other models.

Still, Fantastic review, hope they keep coming
__________________
Forced Induction
SS_01 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 07:43 PM   #82
GTPete
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
GTPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Fatter wheels, = more stress on the driveline, not good for warranty.
Cant see this happening in a hurry, unless they de tune the engine to compensate.
FPV have found a happy medium between warranty, power and engineering.
GTPete is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 08:56 PM   #83
Elks
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Elks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Ghia
If the owner wants DRL's, they can install proper ADR compliant items which are available, replacing the fog lights so they are fully integrated. There is one GT in this forum with them, and they dont look tacky at all.

So that problem solved, the review is even better now.
Any pics of them, on and off?
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
Elks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 09:51 PM   #84
08ESE
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

still looks just like a mk1 boss engined fg gt

the projector surrounds in the headlights are FAR too big and chunky, and it needed an update to the front, as the base models got.

the bob jane this weeks special rims, need to go, and DRLs belong on a float at mardi gras.


having said that.... ill take one in seduce please ( drl free! )



if it gets to the point where they MUST have DRLs, integrate them into the design INSIDE the headlight like audi does. not like some cheap ebay light like ive seen on plenty of f6s here.... they look terribly tacky!



Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
He isn't telling any lies....

Bad news won't go away if you just try to ignore it.

but continue to tell people and itll make less even look.

Last edited by 08ESE; 27-12-2011 at 09:57 PM.
08ESE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-12-2011, 10:02 PM   #85
Silver Ghia
Moderator
Donating Member3
 
Silver Ghia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,603
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: As Silver Ghia his contributions to the AU and BA technical areas have been of high quality and valuable to the member base. 
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elks
Any pics of them, on and off?
Here: http://www.fordforums.com.au/showpos...postcount=7218

I've bought a set for my XR50 but I've delayed the installation until after the hail damage suffered last sunday is sorted out.
Silver Ghia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-12-2011, 12:59 AM   #86
1TUFFUTE
Banned
 
1TUFFUTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodge
Looking forward to it also. He liked the ride-handling balance too, (notice all the naysayers bleating how they don't handle have gone strangly quiet on this thread). FPV's ride / handling is structured around local road conditions, unlike any of the other cars.

Real world rolling acceleration, (i.e. what really matters in real world driving), was also the best of the bunch and just look at the cars and the prices of them, he's comparing it too.
most of what your saying here should be made into a stamp...so any fools around here..or in fact the world that diss these machines... cop one to the forehead EVERY car brand has problems....its there strong points that make them LEGENDS...LIKE OUR FORDS
1TUFFUTE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-12-2011, 08:01 AM   #87
Rodge
Banned
 
Rodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,801
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

^^ Cheers for that.
Unfortunatly no matter what stamp is made, envy will inevitably rear its ugly head from time to time. Put a little of his review quote in my signature though, just couldn't resist and I suppose that's the next best thing to a stamp around here

Last edited by Rodge; 28-12-2011 at 08:11 AM.
Rodge is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-12-2011, 09:23 PM   #88
Shonky.
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Shonky.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,819
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

my bad

Last edited by Shonky.; 28-12-2011 at 09:39 PM. Reason: posted in wrong thread
Shonky. is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-12-2011, 09:31 PM   #89
4.0i_SiX
SiX_iN_a_RoW
 
4.0i_SiX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Capalaba Brisbane
Posts: 770
Default Re: FPV GT Mark II review by CarPoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by 08ESE
still looks just like a mk1 boss engined fg gt

the projector surrounds in the headlights are FAR too big and chunky, and it needed an update to the front, as the base models got.

the bob jane this weeks special rims, need to go, and DRLs belong on a float at mardi gras.


having said that.... ill take one in seduce please ( drl free! )



if it gets to the point where they MUST have DRLs, integrate them into the design INSIDE the headlight like audi does. not like some cheap ebay light like ive seen on plenty of f6s here.... they look terribly tacky!






but continue to tell people and itll make less even look.

Give this man a beer!
__________________
Oh yeah, my G6ET eats diff bushes for breakfast!
4.0i_SiX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL