CFI to MPFI Dyno Runs = 34.1 rwkw Increase - Page 2

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glenneaux

Shoulda gone straight to the BBM..

Anyone who doesn't is just fooling themselves and living in the past....

:

BBM pee double f tee

crannersEL · 21-01-2007, 12:31 PM

Good increase there Shaun!

Well done :-)

**Sorted** · 21-01-2007, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

You do realise I am running standard exhaust standard cam!

Yeah I do, just that other e-series that have had an exhaust and cam don't get up and bogey compared to my stock fairmont and they have about the same KW more power than mine.

If i was going to put an exhaust and cam I would want a noticable difference so that why I asked what sort of difference did you notice for +34.1 kw

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 07:07 PM

Certainly did notice the difference in power. Exhaust will probably help fuel economy however the cam wont.

Walkinshaw · 21-01-2007, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

lol I have heard that the JMM dyno is a little dodgy.

107rwkw from a stock 200k+ 3.9l is a little optimistic...15rwkw above 90% of the other stock MPFI's ive seen run.

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

107rwkw from a stock 200k+ 3.9l is a little optimistic...15rwkw above 90% of the other stock MPFI's ive seen run.

Dont understand what your saying here?

21-01-2007, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

Dont understand what your saying here?

He thinks your dyno read out is BS....

Damo · 21-01-2007, 10:19 PM

dyno read out isn't bullshit and is comparible to your previous read out since it was on the same dyno, but 109 rwkw is a bit optimistic.Take it back to the track shuan, btu install the manual first.

Qwikcorty · 21-01-2007, 10:19 PM

i think that the dyno is a fair one, maybe the humidity had something to do with the high figure? I dont know how they compensate for these things, but it was like being in the butterfly enclosure at the zoo.

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_xr6

He thinks your dyno read out is BS....

Well it ran 109.0 on the Dyno at Hallam the sheet is there so there is my proof! You can talk to qiukcorty and also V8capri (drove the car on the dyno).

I dont need optimism I have proof!!

FordGirl · 21-01-2007, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

Well it ran 109.0 on the Dyno at Hallam the sheet is there so there is my proof! You can talk to qiukcorty and also V8capri (drove the car on the dyno).

I dont need optimism I have proof!!

Sounds like he either
a) doubts the dyno read out, or
b) doubts that the car is a stock mpfi..

either way, massive power increase!

gthofan · 21-01-2007, 10:53 PM

good on ya shaun! if its on the paper, its the truth!!!, just like my ea's quarter mile time

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FordGirl

Sounds like he either
a) doubts the dyno read out, or
b) doubts that the car is a stock mpfi..

either way, massive power increase!

Well there is seriously nothing else sitting under the bonnet of my car than bog stock 3.9l with a Pod Filter. Nothing else.

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gthofan

good on ya shaun! if its on the paper, its the truth!!!, just like my ea's quarter mile time

Exactly Scott.....Exactly!!

bomber · 21-01-2007, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

107rwkw from a stock 200k+ 3.9l is a little optimistic...15rwkw above 90% of the other stock MPFI's ive seen run.

Dyno is not BS my car has run on it twice with pretty much the same figure both times with varing temperature between the 2 days. The amount of ks on an engine means nothing mine has pulled the same figure of 142 rwk from the engine have 140000ks on it and then again with 260000 on it so k's mean nothing!!!

Also driven with SnyperEB a number of times and the power is evident. It is a great improvement Shaun and im sure you can feel the difference in the power increase.

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bomber

Dyno is not BS my car has run on it twice with pretty much the same figure both times with varing temperature between the 2 days. The amount of ks on an engine means nothing mine has pulled the same figure of 142 rwk from the engine have 140000ks on it and then again with 260000 on it so k's mean nothing!!!

Also driven with SnyperEB a number of times and the power is evident. It is a great improvement Shaun and im sure you can feel the difference in the power increase.

You drove it last night aswell!

bomber · 21-01-2007, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

You drove it last night aswell!

That I did and was pretty impressed with the ride aswell!!!

Walkinshaw · 21-01-2007, 11:19 PM

People need to learn to read....

Please find and quote where i have said the dyno used is "BS"

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

People need to learn to read....

Please find and quote where i have said the dyno used is "BS"

Seems like your questioning the dyno?

Walkinshaw · 21-01-2007, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

Seems like your questioning the dyno?

My initial comment was just puerly an observation of your stock MPFI 3.9 dyno run against others i have seen. One dyno day here we had 3 stock MPFI 3.9 auto's run between 92 and 94rwkw. Funnly enough one of them was a converted CFI, which when CFI ran 73rwkw..........

Either way, its a damn good outcome for a few hours work and minimal $$, you'd be cheering.

snypereb · 21-01-2007, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

My initial comment was just puerly an observation of your stock MPFI 3.9 dyno run against others i have seen. One dyno day here we had 3 stock MPFI 3.9 auto's run between 92 and 94rwkw. Funnly enough one of them was a converted CFI, which when CFI ran 73rwkw..........

Either way, its a damn good outcome for a few hours work and minimal $$, you'd be cheering.

Im over the moon! As I have said I told Paul I was only hopeing for 95-100rwkw. When it came up as 109.0 i was smiling!

LTDHO · 22-01-2007, 09:26 PM

Be interesting what it runs on a cool day considering it was pretty hot on satuday.

EDXR6T · 22-01-2007, 09:52 PM

Might have to organise another run to calder shaun.

Jason[98.EL] · 22-01-2007, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EDXR6T

Might have to organise another run to calder shaun.

depending on date i might be in on a run at calder this time

jason

snypereb · 23-01-2007, 12:38 AM

I mesaged Ian not long ago about calder and he was going to get onto it we may just have to have to organise a little crew just to go down there!

EDXR6T · 23-01-2007, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snypereb

I mesaged Ian not long ago about calder and he was going to get onto it we may just have to have to organise a little crew just to go down there!

Yer that's what u was thinking.

Should get a few decent run's in even if we have to be with the rest of the regular crowded to.

SOMEONE ORGANISE IT!!!!!!!!!!!! Shaun the idea's in your thread ther for you should do it

. Il be expecting a thread about it soon so get on it.