Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2007, 02:38 AM   #31
BLACKAUXR8
Young !@#$ Head
 
BLACKAUXR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 796
Default

the 351 block has more metal in it. A stock 302 block will crack if you try and run anymore than around 450hp through it. So ive been told anyway i could be wrong!
BLACKAUXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 03:21 AM   #32
FGII-XR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FGII-XR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
Default

i've been told by reliable sources that the blocks are the same
FGII-XR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 03:49 AM   #33
BLACKAUXR8
Young !@#$ Head
 
BLACKAUXR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 796
Default

ill have to check that out. This will save me sourcing a late model 351 roller block. Cheers for that!!
BLACKAUXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 06:48 AM   #34
mikford
Clevor Coupe
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Frankston
Posts: 52
Default 351 windsor

sorry to pry guys but i`m 99 % sure the 351 is 1inch taller block, and your right about the torque, i have a 351 windsor with 302 closed chambered cleveland heads in my xc coupe and the sheet says 166.4rwkw @ 723Nm torque but only prob is the sheet dosn`t say rev range. love to have that power in my 5litre au xls..mick.
mikford is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 09:01 AM   #35
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

Yes I have done the deed and droped the 351 in my AU XR. It can be done, it isnt hard. Their are now a few floating around, the added cubic inches is very welcome and next time I will be going a stroker 351 up to say 408 or thereabouts, Ive dont mine for club and race use rather than street us but still easy to do, I ran it on the street with efi in its last guise.

Dont mind sharing all I know so send me a pm or fire some questions here.

I've got pics of mine with all the EFI gear on it as well if you would like to see these, you only have a few manifolds to choose from being the GT40 lower, TFS lower and a couple others, you need to think big as airflow is 20% greater than a 302 from the start as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jimt3te50
I think Sledgehammer said he'd never do it again.........
Yep....I said that.

Last edited by Sledgehammer; 11-05-2007 at 09:11 AM.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 09:02 AM   #36
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikford
sorry to pry guys but i`m 99 % sure the 351 is 1inch taller block, and your right about the torque, i have a 351 windsor with 302 closed chambered cleveland heads in my xc coupe and the sheet says 166.4rwkw @ 723Nm torque but only prob is the sheet dosn`t say rev range. love to have that power in my 5litre au xls..mick.

Yes correct, 1 inch taller.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 09:05 AM   #37
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKAUXR8
ill have to check that out. This will save me sourcing a late model 351 roller block. Cheers for that!!

I would not use a 351 roller block they are not the same. I used an early read 1969 block for the added strength. The real advantage over the 302 block is better rods, main caps thicker, 1/2 inch head bolts used, generally more metal etc but at a cost - weight.

If you are on an unlimited budget use an aftermarket block like a dart as the base, otherwise you will have to see what you can find the '51 blocks are not everywhere these days.

Blocks are also wider in the valley, compared to 302, so anyone whos knows what they are looking at will see this straight away.

Last edited by Sledgehammer; 11-05-2007 at 09:15 AM.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 09:33 AM   #38
347 mont
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
347 mont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle W.A
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by au3xr6
use a 302 block the difference between the 302 & 351 is stroke IE crank & rods so with a 302 block the insurance co will never know
That is the case with cleveland motor but with the Windsor they ARE different blocks, the deck height is higher, 302mhas adeck height of 8.2, 351 has a 9.5 deck height and are wider
__________________
Losing my patients with unfinished threads
Did the ideas people helped you with work or not!
347 mont is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-05-2007, 10:32 AM   #39
toyotaxr8
Regular Member
 
toyotaxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 364
Default

the mains in the 351w are 3inch and i think the 302w has smaller mains
__________________
MR INCH
toyotaxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-05-2007, 02:10 PM   #40
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by au3xr6
use a 302 block the difference between the 302 & 351 is stroke IE crank & rods so with a 302 block the insurance co will never know
Yes I would stroke the '02 to 347. No one would know. One of the above posts says 450HP max, thats pretty much close to mark with a 302 block as they are not structurally strong enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by toyotaxr8
the mains in the 351w are 3inch and i think the 302w has smaller mains
The 351W crank can be used in the 302W. Its offset ground to make the stroker, some combos below:

CID Block Bore OverBore Crank Stroke RodLength Notes
314 302 4 0.03 302 3.075 5.205 Offset grind crank to 3.075 / Likely uses turbo 4 cylinder rods 400 horsepower maximum
319 302 4 0.03 302 3.125 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.125 / 500 horsepower maximum
331 302 4 0.03 302 3.242 5.2 Offset grind crank to 3.240 / Likely uses 1.9L 4 cylinder rods 400 horsepower maximum
337 302 4 0.03 351W 3.3 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.3
342 302 4 0.03 351W 3.35 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.350
342 302 4 0.03 351W 3.35 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.35
347 302 4 0.03 351W 3.4 5.4 Offset grind crank to 3.400 / or use Summit SES-5-52-05-000 or Trick Flow crank TFS-55325360 with Summit SES-5-44-05-201 rod
357 302 4 0.03 351W 3.5 5.4
372 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.64 6.2 Offset grind crank to 3.640 / 600 horsepower maximum
375 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.68 6.125 Offset grind crank to 3.680 / Likely uses Chrysler 340/360 rods 575 horsepower maximum
377 351W 4 0.03 351W 3.7 6.2 Offset grind crank to 3.70 / 550 horsepower maximum
393 351W 4 0.03 400M 3.85 6.209 Offset grind crank to 3.850 / Will not require cylinder bore notching No mallory metal required for balancing Users Chrysler 340/360 rods.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-05-2007, 04:24 PM   #41
HLC
Audi S3
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
Default

that bonnet buldge/scoop looks sweet.
__________________
HLC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-05-2007, 05:32 PM   #42
AU1XLS
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
AU1XLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hallam
Posts: 1,897
Default

Be prepared to do bonnet mods as well due to block height of the 351w compared to the 302w
AU1XLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-05-2007, 06:19 PM   #43
Sledgehammer
Banned
 
Sledgehammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Qld Moderator
Posts: 3,731
Default

Gotta love a bonnet scoop on an AU, they just set them off nicely.
Sledgehammer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL