|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-11-2012, 09:58 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Starter Motor
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 11
|
I realise from many threads on this subject that TQ95..95LE etc is considered a must for the BTR's as opposed to say a dex. However is 95 which is a mineral still preferable over a synthetic?
Nulon state on their website that their synthetic ATF meets the requirements for the BTR. I guess my question is, would it and other synthetics be preferable to the 95? My trans specialist uses Fuchs 4400 (mineral) for BTR's which is a suitable 95 replacement according to the Fuchs website (he also uses it in his own BA and BF). I did notice blueoval on another thread stated he uses synthetic in his auto. Anyone else have any experience in this? Thanks Dave |
||
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 10:50 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
My preference with oils, regardless of what/where they go in, is always synthetic over mineral.
__________________
RAM 1500
|
||
|
|
|
ATF - Synthetic?
Linear Mode
