![]() |
|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,573
|
if people will call a LC/LJ XU1 as a muscle car I have no problem calling a mustang with an Ecoboost 2L turbo a muscle car considering the Ecoboost is more powerful then a 202.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
3 users like this post: |
![]() |
#2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,983
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Windsor=Screamer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 858
|
I have no issue with 4 cylinder Mustangs or even Falcons, but they are NOT muscle cars and should not ever be mistaken as one.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
2 users like this post: |
![]() |
#4 | ||
R51 Pathy, 91 Jayco Swan
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mackay, QLD
Posts: 3,635
|
Sounds like a limp wristed pussy car, not a muscle car.
Last edited by blackf6; 09-03-2013 at 04:24 PM. Reason: punctuation |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
Wasn't that long ago, 2009 IIRC, Mustang still came with a ~200hp V6 as a base model. Now this Ecoboost I4 model will likely be 240HP minimum, and could go as high as 300hp.
Sure, don't call it a muscle car, but a Mustang was never really a muscle car anyway. Neither was the Corvette. It was a pony car which was a class of its own in the 60's. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|