|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31-07-2009, 09:37 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,215
|
Just after reading the outshine thing. I am wondering if anyone will debate the history of why! certain model falcon's were better than holden's ect, with both in 6 cyl & V8. "in there day". pro and con. whether it be ute, fairmont vs premier. and maybe a bit of history as to why the company did so and so.
Starting from the 1960's XK as i recon that any holden with a gray motor in it was rubbish and is not worth talking about. and as every one knows all ford before 1960 were better than holdens anyway.  : The XK was a very advanced car in it's day. and ford Australia were on the right track introducing it. a modern car with a big powerful 144 ci motor and a year after a monster 170 ci motor. The XL wins hands down vs holden. The XM has to contend with the holden red motor, but ford have a 200 ci motor now to. but falcon has a hardtop beat that. The XP gets a 3 speed auto in 1965 poor old holden don't get a 3 speed auto until 1970. The XR a 289 V8 what was holden's answer  :from 1968 on thing get :evil3: |
||
|
|
History of Ford vs Holden models
Threaded Mode