|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
17-03-2006, 01:22 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Near the Water
Posts: 71
|
Heard on grapevine that yesterday Ford has just received 20 push rod engines (either 6.2 or 6.3ltr) for testing. Are they going to drop the 5.4 in leiu of the new beasts to reduce problems they have wih 5.4??
Anyone heard anything similar?? |
||
17-03-2006, 01:23 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,098
|
problems with the 5.4?
|
||
17-03-2006, 02:06 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
|
Why would they drop the QOHC for a pushrod?
|
||
17-03-2006, 02:17 PM | #4 | ||
XR5T - Sea Grey.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 858
|
For more power. Technology aint important, results are!
For the record, I'm a refinement/economy person before a V8-powaahhhh! hoon, but I still would like to see something better than what the Boss is coming up with. "6.2Lt BOSS: Make the Boss work for you." Geez, this marketing thing isn't very hard is it! : |
||
17-03-2006, 02:10 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth, Wa
Posts: 710
|
i would have thought to boss engines would be far more advanced than a push rod engine both in terms of power, econ and emissions.....
__________________
2010 Audi A4 2.0TFSI Quattro
|
||
17-03-2006, 03:32 PM | #6 | ||
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
|
Talk is the Quad cam set-up is too pricey, and not much point having it if they rev limit it to 5950Rpm ot whatever it is, the poor thing just gets going then the damn fuel cuy out kick in.
6.2L Boss Sounds nice... |
||
17-03-2006, 03:35 PM | #7 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
I think if they do anything a bigger bore/shorter stroke mod engine would be better than going back to pushrods... |
|||
17-03-2006, 08:01 PM | #8 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
|
I wouldnt like to see Ford/FPV go back to pushrod engines, especially since they made the technical advance to DOHC on both I6's and V8's(Boss V8s). There has now been 2 threads on pushrod engines but i dont know of any pushrod engines in the current ford US line up, unless its some kind of truck engine which i dont know of. Ford were planning to develop a new engine called the hurricane v8 which was 6.2-6.3 litres of capacity but im sure that had overhead camshafts as well, anyway that engine development was cancelled. There was a thread from a user on this board over a year ago that FPV got to test supercharged v8's for orion. I think we will see a more aussie developed boss DOHC v8 for orion or a supercharged Boss DOHC v8.
|
||
17-03-2006, 08:46 PM | #9 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 914
|
Quote:
|
|||
17-03-2006, 08:24 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hervey Bay
Posts: 4,198
|
Don't forget, Ford like GM is in big trouble financially and the bean counters don't care what the engine is if they think it presents a more profitable business case.
|
||
17-03-2006, 08:43 PM | #11 | |||
Aussie_Geo
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kensington, WA
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
I am afraid you might be onto something there. We all know that both the General and Henry are bleeding badly and during these situations the bean counters are listened to, not the engineers...... sadly it is a case of short term thinking by the corporate types. Peter
__________________
: Velocity Typhoon : :sm_headba 366 rwkw 770 Nm Xtreme Tuned and Nizpro Stage 2 :sm_headba WARNING! Highly Addictive
|
|||
17-03-2006, 08:47 PM | #12 | |||
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
|
Quote:
|
|||
17-03-2006, 08:59 PM | #13 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
|
|||
17-03-2006, 09:01 PM | #14 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards Alan FG GT in Lightning Strike 5th anniversary edition in manual 1 of 25 And an 2019 MD Mondeo Trend Wagon in Platinum White |
|||
17-03-2006, 09:35 PM | #15 | ||||
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
18-03-2006, 03:48 AM | #16 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
Quote:
|
|||
18-03-2006, 01:25 PM | #17 | |||
Diabolus
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
|
|||
17-03-2006, 09:20 PM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
i was under the impression it was a weight problem not a boss problem ???
|
||
17-03-2006, 09:36 PM | #19 | |||
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,943
|
Quote:
|
|||
17-03-2006, 09:45 PM | #20 | |||
XB in parts...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,890
|
Quote:
I didn't think Ford had anything in this capacity (big block aside).
__________________
Daily Driver 2019 Ford Escape...looking for XR6T's. |
|||
18-03-2006, 01:14 PM | #21 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
|
Could the new engine be like whats in the new Chrysler V8's where the computer can shut down 2 cyclinders for better fuel economy?
|
||
18-03-2006, 01:17 PM | #22 | ||
windsor user
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geelong
Posts: 13,123
|
the chrysler V8's shut down 4 cyls, and this is what i would be thinking of ford were to introduce a pushrod engine....
the chrysler technology works by the lifters for the one bank lifting themselves away from the cam. i dont know how the rest of it works but..... i dont think this would be easily implemented on an OHC engine.... |
||
18-03-2006, 01:23 PM | #23 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 287
|
The reason why HSV did not fit extractors to the LS2 was due to the sound, i am not sure exactly what sound it would be. They said americans prefer the sound of the engine with the extractors and the australians wouldn't, because it might have sounded like something was wrong with the engine.
|
||
18-03-2006, 03:37 PM | #24 | |||
Clevo Mafia Inc.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
|
Quote:
|
|||
18-03-2006, 06:32 PM | #25 | ||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
i think this thread was just posted to get hsv to start sourcing/developing a new 8 litre v8 designed to whip a boss 6.2 litre . hahahaha
|
||
19-03-2006, 02:43 PM | #26 | |||
Supercharged Mang-mobile
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Behind the wheel
Posts: 1,792
|
Quote:
__________________
09/00 VX HSV XU6 Build #0001 of 0171 http://fordforums.com.au/showthread....09#post5571209 -- Best E/T: |14.982 @92.12mph | R/T:0.013 | 60' 2.213| 330: 6.283 | 1/8: 9.624 @ 73.17mph | 1000: 12.529 | 25Deg, N/A Hum, 1010mb | Willowbank Raceway 7/12/16 Tickford EL Falcon XR6 RIP -- Factory Manual -- Best E/T: |14.991 @ 92.71mph | R/T: 0.607 | 60': 2.215 | 660': 9.665 |13Deg, 86%H, 1024mb, 184RA @ Willowbank Raceway |
|||
18-03-2006, 07:21 PM | #27 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
here we go
|
||
19-03-2006, 02:45 PM | #28 | ||
Pimp Daddy Pimp Pimp
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Queensland Events Assistant Co-Ordinator. Fiery's Little Helper
Posts: 1,942
|
fungy
__________________
Got a Qld, Contact Us PM ULTIMATE PM FIERY (The Guru) --------------------------------------------------- AFF Merchandise Excellent Purchases With: AFF Team, Rooster, Russ |
||
19-03-2006, 04:02 PM | #29 | ||
Guy that posts stuff
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 553
|
The DOHC 5.4L V8 is going to be a problem, and a (the?) reason why is pedestrian safety.
It just sits too high. Ford is going to have problems designing crumple zones for pedestrian safety. While Jag is developing pyrotechnic bonnets which may or may not get around this problem, it would add thousands to a V8 price which already costs thousands more. The DOHC 5.4 is already at the peak of its natural development, there is no way to get more power without compromising emissions, reliability or driveability. EURO IV emissions would kill it off completely. Not to mention its fairly expensive, not that powerful, big and heavy. The 5.4L SOHC is more emissions friendly, makes simular torque and can make simular power. Power jumped 10kw in the last face lift, I would image theres atleast another 20-40kw sitting on Fords desk awaiting new models and facelifts. I honestly wouldn't be suprised if the FPV range switched to a 5.4L Supercharged V8 until a new V8 engine is developed. The supercharged V8's would offer more power (~330Kw) more torque (~600Nm), substancially improved driveability and acceleration. They would be more expensive than even a GT-P even in basic trim, but the F6 range would still give FPV a foothold in the volume market. Still which Ford fan would be disapointed with a 330Kw supercharged 8 leading the range? Another option is that FPV get a slightly enhanced alloy SOHC 5.4 V8. But this would be a hard case for marketing with a power deficit over the previous model and competiting products from other marques. Ford US has no replacement V8. The current modular motors are the only choice if Ford Australia wants a V8. If they don't want or can't have the the 5.4 or the 4.6, then they won't have a V8. |
||
19-03-2006, 07:31 PM | #30 | ||
Starter Motor
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 11
|
Hello. :
|
||