Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
The comments at the end of that article are from a few people who share your idea of a conspiracy. .
|
You put the link up with the comments discreditting your author's view.
Sorry it has backfired on you.
Hiding behind a personal attack is quite childish on your part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
The fact that the publisher allows alternative views to be posted on their website shows they aren’t as biased as you claim..
|
So...you can read my mind as well as knowing everything about all things ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
Your references are a solicitor who wants to be a politician and is trying to be noticed.
|
He is not a solicitor, he is an economist with a history of being chief of staff to a senator who is now ambassador to the US.
Dunno what planet you are on...maybe your medication needs revision?
maybe your the one who needs to be noticed...maybe go back to posting in the word games thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
and a salesman for a company encouraging people to buy gold. The same person also suggested digital currencies might be safer than fiat currency in the same article. .
|
Nobody is trying to sell me gold...maybe your porn sites have hijacked your browser?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
If you read the solicitor’s opinion you’ll see from the language that he is suggesting it might be a possibility, not a certainty. No one else has come forward to endorse his view..
|
No...it is an "option" for the banks is what he is saying...try to keep up matey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
You also put forward some nonsense about people with surnames after “K” missing out on their claims - where did you get that idea from?.
|
I tried to dumb it down as much as possible but you still don't get it.
Not worth my effort to educate you...rather scratch my left testicle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
And if they are changing the wording in the legislation to remove all possible doubt then your conspiracy theory is just hot air. If it was their intention to include deposits in the bail-in they wouldn’t be amending it. .
|
err...you really re trolling, or illiterate.
The only reason they are looking at the legisltion is because the author brought it to their attention.
I cannot make things any clearer to you than that....how you wander off into assumptions is bewildering to most people I suspect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
Id also say it is irresponsible to put up nonsense that might influence someone to withdraw their money from the bank and put it somewhere less secure..
|
How about you bury your head in a sandpit and don't bother posting any more then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trendseeker
But no one here is stupid enough to believe that rubbish.
.
|
did you finish high school, were you teached gooder?