Quote:
Originally Posted by zilo
I am still laughing at the comments at the end of that article you linked..
|
The comments at the end of that article are from a few people who share your idea of a conspiracy. The fact that the publisher allows alternative views to be posted on their website shows they aren’t as biased as you claim.
Your references are a solicitor who wants to be a politician and is trying to be noticed and a salesman for a company encouraging people to buy gold. The same person also suggested digital currencies might be safer than fiat currency in the same article.
If you read the solicitor’s opinion you’ll see from the language that he is suggesting it might be a possibility, not a certainty. No one else has come forward to endorse his view.
You also put forward some nonsense about people with surnames after “K” missing out on their claims - where did you get that idea from?
And if they are changing the wording in the legislation to remove all possible doubt then your conspiracy theory is just hot air. If it was their intention to include deposits in the bail-in they wouldn’t be amending it.
Id also say it is irresponsible to put up nonsense that might influence someone to withdraw their money from the bank and put it somewhere less secure. But no one here is stupid enough to believe that rubbish.