Quote:
Originally Posted by .:4:.
I dont think it would have been clutch related (tranamission, whatever). Modern cars say no before that happens. Id be, at a guess, be inclined to think an oil line to a turbo ruptured or popped off. From memory, the turbos in modern v8 amgs are in the valley in the centre of the block not in the conventional place.
|
So I guess the "malfunction" defence is not sounding so looney after all
"Your honour, my client was very fortunate not to be harmed by the vehicle's malfunction. We demand a replacement"
Not sure how the dangerous driving charge will stick. He wasn't going fast, he didn't do a skid, and the bystanders weren't egging him on in any obvious way. How do you prove intent when the alleged intended action didn't occur?
