[FoxtrotGolfXray 5.0]

Originally Posted by Bossxr8

If they are caught fair and square by the police, then yes.

If they are relying on some dodgy camera that gives false positives, and then they say it's up to the receiver of the fine to prove they are innocent, then no, that is complete bull****. Disgraceful conduct imo.

Our justice system was founded on innocent until proven guilty. I don't know how this stuff can bypass that principal.

Is there any evidence that these systems are generating a significant proportion of false positives or are you just postulating? The whole premise of your argument is based around this 'If' statement.

if the above is proven, then I'd agree with you. If it's not, then I support the technology.